torstai 8. tammikuuta 2009

Lopputenttien lukuvaatimukset

.
Ennen kolmen viikon joululomaa keräsin yhdessä toisen suomalaisopiskelijan kanssa lopputenttien lukuvaatimukset. Päivämäärä tarkoittaa ao. tentin ajankohtaa vuonna 2009. Suluissa oleva (ok), tarkoittaa, että olen lukenut sisällön.

11.1. Technology management (open book)

  1. kirja Turban: kappaleet 1-3, 5, 8, 9, 11, 13 ja 14 (ok)
  2. Technology guide 1-6 (ok)
  3. Introduction and key theoretical concepts (Professor Marko Torkkeli)

    1. Innovativeness of a company
    2. Practical tools on opportunity identification, opportunity register, value chain management, defining of your offering, key attributes of a product, market-busting positioning. Tools/worksheets with an illustrative examples. (ok)
    3. Major points of the articles (not the one you summarized or commented).
    4. Open innovation. (ok)
    4.1. Open innovation paradigm (ok)
    4.2. The areas of the open innovation (ok)
    4.2.1. Exploring technologies outside the boundaries of the company (ok)
    4.2.2. Using corporate venture capital and corporation venturing (ok)
    4.2.3. Proactive management of IP and intangible assets (ok)
    4.2.4. Open source development (ok)
    4.2.5. Towards more open business model (ok)

    Reference
    1. Presentations. (ok)
    2. Viskari Sari, Salmi Pekka and Torkkeli Marko, Implementation of open innovation paradigm: Cases: Cisco Systems, DuPont, IBM, Intel, Lucent, P&G, Philips and Sun Microsystems. 60 p., 978-952-214-478-2, 189, Research, http://kouvola.lut.fi/files/download/ResearchReport_189-20071106.pdf (ok)

15.1. Cross-cultural managment and business ethics (open book)

  1. seuraavat artikkelit:
    1. Branco M., Rodriges L. Corporate social responsibility and resource-based perspectives //Journal of Business Ethics. 2006 (69). P. 111-132. (ok)
    2. Carroll A. Managing ethically with global stakeholders: a present and future challenge //
    Academy of Management Executive. 2004. Vol. 18. No. 2. P. 114–120. (ok)
    3. Cavanagh G., Moberg D., Velasquez M. Making business ethics practical // Business
    Ethics Quarterly. 1995. Vol. 5. Issue 3. P. 399–418. (ok)
    4. Cavanagh G. Global business ethics: regulations, code, or self-restraint // Business Ethics Quarterly. 2004. Vol. 14. Issue 4. P. 625–642. (ok)
    5. Donaldson Th., Dunfee Th. Toward a unified conception of business ethics: Integrative
    Social Contract Theory // The Academy of Management Review. 1994. Vol. 19. No. 2. P.
    252–284. (ok)
    6. Donaldson Th., Preston L. The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence, and implications // The Academy of Management Review. 1995. Vol. 20. No. 1. P. 65–91. (ok)
    7. Johnson H. Does it pay to be good? Social responsibility and financial performance //
    Business Horizons. 2003. November-December. P. 34-40. (ok)
    8. Lenssen G., Perrini F., Tencati A., Lacy P. Guest editorial // Corporate Governance: The
    International Journal of Business and Society. 2007. Vol. 7. № 4. P. 344–354. (ok)
    9. Porter M., Kramer M. Strategy and society // Harvard Business Review. 2006. December. P. 78-87. (ok)
    10. Puffer S.M., McCarthy D.J. Finding the common ground in Russian and American
    business ethics // California Management Review. 1995. Vol. 37. # 2. (ok)
    11. Shepard J.M., Shepard J., Stephens C., Wimbush J. The place of ethics in business:
    shifting paradigms? // Business Ethics Quarterly. 1995. Vol. 5. Issue 3. P. 577–601. (ok)
    12. Schwartz M., Carroll A. Corporate social responsibility: a three-domain approach //
    Business Ethics Quarterly. 2003. Vol. 13. Issue 4. P. (ok)
    13. Young S. Fiduciary duties as a helpful guide to ethical decision-making in business //
    Journal of Business Ethics. 2007. Vol. 74. # 3. P. 1-15. (ok)
    14. Zadek S. The path to corporate responsibility // Harvard Business Review. 2004.
    December. P. 125-132. (ok)
  2. Case study: Hanson. Kirk. O. The case of nutritional food. (ok)
  3. kertaa utilitarian, rights, justice ja universal- konseptit (ok)
  4. luentokalvot (ok)
  5. Kirjat
  • Werther, W.B.-Jr. & Chandler D. 2005. Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility: Stakeholders in a Global Environment. Sage Publications. (pakollinen) (luettu kursiivisesti)
  • Crane A. & Matten D. 2006. Business Ethics. Oxford University Press. 2nd edition. (vapaaehtoinen, mutta parempi kirja) (luettu alkupäästä)

19.1. Knowledge management

  1. luentokalvot: Andreeva, Pöyhönen, Blomqvist (ok)
  2. seuraavat artikkelit
  • Topic 1. Introduction. Basic definitions and concepts
1. Romer, P.M., Kurtzman, J. 2004. “The Knowledge Economy”, In: Handbook on Knowledge Management 1: Knowledge Matters, pp.73-87. (ok)
2. McDermott, R. 1999. “Why Information Technology Inspired But Cannot Deliver Knowledge Management”, California Management Review, Vol. 41 Issue 4, pp.103-117. (ok)
  • Topic 2. Key knowledge-related processes: key concepts and key problems
3. (case study) Cerny, K. Making Local Knowledge Global. Harvard Business Review, May/Jun96, Vol. 74 Issue 3, pp.22-26. (ok)
4. Nonaka, I., Konno, N. 1998. “The Concept of `Ba': Building a Foundation for Knowledge Creation”, California Management Review, Vol. 40 Issue 3, pp.40-54. (ok)
5. Husted, K., Michailova, S. 2002. “Diagnosing and Fighting Knowledge-Sharing Hostility”, Organizational Dynamics, Vol.31, No.1, pp.60-73. (ok)
6. Szulanski, G., Winter, S. 2002. “Getting It Right the Second Time”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 80, Issue 1, p62-69. (ok)
7. de Holan, P.M., Phillips, N., Lawrence, T.B. 2004. “Managing Organizational Forgetting”, MIT Sloan Management Review, Vol. 45 Issue 2, p45-51. (ok)
8. Bettancourt, L.A., A.L. Ostrom, S.W. Brown, and R.I. Roundtree. 2002. “Client Co-Production in Knowledge-Intensive Business Services”, California Management Review, 44(4): 100-128. (ok)
9. (case-study) Andreeva T.E. “Knowledge sharing as a prerequisite for success: example of NPK “Mechanobr-Technika” (GSOM case center publication, to be provided to students via course website)
  • Topic 3. The human factor in KM
10. Lepak, D.P., Snell S. 1999. “The human resource architecture: toward a theory of human capital allocation and development”, Academy of Management Review, Vol.24, No.1, p31-48 (ok)
11. Wenger, E.C., Snyder, W.M. 2000. „Communities of Practice: The Organizational Frontier“, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 78 Issue 1, p139-145. (ok)
12. Kelloway, E. K., Barling, J. 2000. “Knowledge work as organizational behavior”, International Journal of Management Reviews, Vol. 2 Issue 3, Pp. 287-304. (ok)
  • Topic 4. Organizational infrastructure for KM
13. Zack, M.H. 1999. “Developing a Knowledge Strategy”, California Management Review, Vol.41, No.3, pp.125-145. (ok)
14. Miles, R.E., Snow, C.S., Mathews, J.A., Miles, G., Coleman Jr., H.J. 1997. “Organizing in the knowledge age: Anticipating the cellular form”, Academy of Management Executive, Vol. 11 Issue 4, pp.7-20 (ok)
15. Bontis, N. 2001. “CKO Wanted - Evangelical Skills Necessary: A Review of the Chief Knowledge Officer Position”, Knowledge & Process Management, Vol. 8 Issue 1, p29-38. (ok)
16. Curtis, R., Leon, D. 2002. “Supporting knowledge work with physical design”, KM Review, Vol. 5 Issue 5, pp.26-29. (ok)
17. De Long, D.W., Davenport, T. 2003. “Better practices for retaining organizational knowledge: Lessons from the leading edge”, Employment Relations Today, Volume 30; Issue 3; pp.51-63
18. (case-study) (to be confirmed later). (ok)
  • Topic 5. Cross-cultural issues in KM
19. Javidan, M., Stahl, G.K., Brodbeck, F., Wilderom, C.P.M. 2005. “Cross-border transfer of knowledge: Cultural lessons from Project GLOBE”, Academy of Management Executive, Vol. 19 Issue 2, pp.59-76 (ok)
  • Topic 6. Knowledge management as a theory: key developments of the scientific discipline and future research questions (visiting lecturers)
20. Blomqvist K. and Pöyhönen A. 2006. "Knowledge-based view of the firm - Theoretical notions and implications for management", an unpublished working paper. (ok)
21. Spender, J.-C. 1996. "Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm", Strategic Management Journal, 17, 45-62. (ok)
22. Nahapiet, J., Ghoshal, S. (1998), 'Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage, The Academy of Management Review, vol. 23 no. 2 (April 1998), pp. 242-266. (ok)
23. Dyer, J. H. & Singh, H. (1998), 'The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage',The Academy of Management Review, vol. 23 no. 4 (Oct., 1998), pp. 660-679. (ok)
24. Metaxiotis, K., Ergazakis, K. & Psarras, J. (2005) 'Exploring the world of knowledge management: Agreements and disagreements in the academic/practitioner community', Journal of Knoweldge Management, 9, 2. (ok)
25. Schultze, U. & Stabell, C. 2004. 'Knowing what you don't know? Discourses and contradictions in knowledge management research', Journal of Management Studies, 41, 4. (ok)
26. Alavi, M. & Leidner, D. 2001. 'Review: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues', MIS Quarterly, 25, 1 (ok)

23.1. Managerial economics (closed book)

  1. kirja Baye. Managerial economics and business strategy.
  2. luentomateriaalit

27.1. Research methods

  1. määrällinen: kirja + kalvot
  2. laadullinen: kalvot
.
Lähettänyt klo
Tunnisteet: ,